Google’s Android Phone Leads the Way: Augmented Reality

August 30th, 2009

“The future has already arrived. It’s just not evenly distributed yet.”
-William Gibson

While for many the idea of using Skype in the classroom to enhance instruction still seems far off in some science fiction author’s vision of the future, others are already using it and what’s more, they realize that it’s only the tip of the coming wave in ed tech advances.

Skype creates a bridge between classrooms, fostering ideas through its immediate application, but augmented realities will build bridges between you, your students, and the world around you.

Wikipedia defines augmented reality as “a field of computer research which deals with the combination of real-world and computer-generated data (virtual reality), where computer graphics objects are blended into real footage in real time.” This technology, while still in its infancy, has as many educational applications as there are minds to dream them up.

“Advancements in mobile phone technology have cleared the way for a coming wave of “augmented reality” applications that merge the physical world with information compiled about people and places on the Internet,” writes John D. Sutter for CNN.com. In his article he points out the variety of existing applications, ones that are still in sandbox mode, and others that are just being conceptualized.

As examples, Sutter mentions Wikitude, an app that provides information on landmarks; Total Immersion, which turns baseball cards in 3-D images; and Layer, a mobile browser that allows people to see information blurbs on the local landscape. (Check out the videos below for examples.) Another version of augmented reality tech that I’ve read about uses glasses to display the data, instead of phones. Less unwieldy, but further away in terms of availability. These applications are the few and the early – and are, of course, limited by the scope of the hardware that runs them. While I admit to being one of the impatient types – raised on the heady visions of Robert Heinlein, William Gibson, and Arthur C. Clarke – my excitement over the potential uses of this technology makes the wait worthwhile.

What does this mean for education? I can imagine field trips where students lift their phones to view a monument’s history, age, and relevance. A classroom with students answering questions by direct message twittering – the answer silently hanging above their heads, viewable to the teacher only. For a moment, let’s forget that many school can’t afford the computers that are needed to run Skype let alone the Android phones that will access this new, augmented reality. How can you see educators using it for an interactive and engaging learning environment?

I have images inspired by William Gibson’s novels floating though my mind – visions of a world that allows everyone to access humanity’s infinite wealth of information from anywhere, at anytime.

“Why shouldn’t we give our teachers a license to obtain software, all software, any software, for nothing? Does anyone demand a licensing fee, each time a child is taught the alphabet?” -William Gibson



Google’s CEO Resigns From Apple’s Board – Are You Surprised?

August 30th, 2009

Apple Planet
Google CEO Eric Schmidt has resigned from Apple’s board due to “potential conflicts of interest”. Is anyone surprised?

While I’m not trying to be snarky, I did have a tongue-in-cheek reaction to this news. As an iPhone owner, advocate, and usually, ally – I have to admit to finding my iPhone conviction wavering as I watch Apple reject one golden opportunity to join the collaborative world after another.

Their latest bungle was the rejection of the Google Voice app., a move that, to be fair, may also be blamed on AT&T (while AT&T has no official role in Apple’s decisions, there is talk that they were the reason for Apple’s move).

What does Apple/AT&T have to be afraid of? Google Voice offers free calls in the US, free SMS messages, useful features such as voicemail transcripts, phone routing, and your choice of notification methods among a list of others. I have one of the beta accounts, but lacking a way to connect it to my iPhone, I’m missing out on the greatest feature it offers – the potential to radically simplify my work/home connection.

Apple needs to separate its phone from its carrier. How about letting Verizon or T-Mobile into the game? Then we could be sure it really was Apple’s decision to block Google Voice. Granted, I’m not unaware that Apple and AT&T are in business to make money and allowing applications to offer similar services for free might seem counter-intuitive.

Consider this, though – the wold is continuing to become more and more connected. With our increasing reliance on on smart phones and PDAs to get our work done and our lives ordered, the companies who are hiding behind scale-me-not walls will be left in the virtual dust.

Now that the FCC is investigating Apple’s decision to reject the Google Voice app, it’s possible that a drawbridge will be forced down anyways – regardless of AT&T’s “unofficial” preferences. What do you think? Did Apple do the right thing?

(pic from flickr.com/photos/italintheheart)

Is Increased Connectivity Dumbing Us Down?

August 30th, 2009

I just finished reading “Get Smarter”, an article by Jamais Cascio in The Atlantic, and am left tingling with anticipation. A brave new era full of innovative intelligence, augmented thought patterns, and an ever deepening sense of the world around us is developing as I type.

brave-new-world

Cascio argues that this age of hyper-connectivity, instead of “dumbing” us down, is actually spurring our brains to evolve to meet the challenge. We’ve done it before, he says, and we will do it again, only now we have powerful tools such as the internet, smart drugs, and artificial intelligences to help us along.

Forget the idea that technology decreases our natural ability to think, instead wrap your mind around the concept that it’s helping us to make more intricate connections and recognize increasingly elaborate patterns. This shift isn’t taking away our intelligence, but changing it to fit our evolving environment.

These skills are referred to as “fluid intelligence”, what Cascio calls “the ability to find meaning in confusion and to solve new problems independent of acquired knowledge”. It’s not that we have too much information available, Cascio says, it’s that we are just beginning to develop the necessary tools to process it.

Put away your fears of losing your livelihood to advanced computer systems because “intelligence augmentation decreases the need for specialization and increases participatory complexity” – in short, the jobs of the future will allow for more people to perform them as advanced technologies will fill in the knowledge gaps.

What about classroom learning? There was a day (and in some places, still is) when calculator use was considered cheating. Now our children use computers at their desks, mobile phones for instant information retrieval, and social applications for study groups. Yes, these tools are becoming “smarter”, but so are the children who grow up using them. As Cascio says, “the same advances in processor and process that would produce a machine mind would also increase the power of our own cognitive-enhancement technologies”.

“Our ability to build the future that we want,” Cascio ends with, “- not just a future we can survive – depends on our capacity to understand the complex relationships of the world’s systems.”

I, for one, agree. What do you think?

(pic from dirjournal.com)